Breakdown - Sharks of the Corn

Wiki Article

Are you ready to take experiencing a thrilling trip through shark-infested fields of corn? Take a seat because "Sharks of the Corn" is here to give you the ultimate in horror and comedy. Filmed by the legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra budget-conscious film is a homage to Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) which transforms into an hilarious and hilarious mockumentary that will have you looking around and rolling around on the floor at the sound of laughter.

One of the most exciting Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

From the beginning of an innocent field "Sharks of the Corn" is able to establish its uniqueness. We are introduced to Gary and Susan and Susan, two people who quickly fade into the background as the film takes off in unexpected direction. The plot weaves together gore elements and an array of subplots, creating a delightful blend that can be described as being a cornfield celebration filled with chaos.

An Psychoopathic Shark Enthusiast

Then there's Teddy Bo Lucas, a personality that brings an additional twist to an extremely confusing plot. The psychotic shark enthusiast is an uncanny obsession with these creatures of the sea. In case sharks and cornfields were not already bizarre enough Teddy is taking his fascination to a new height when he commits a shocking murder in his room at the motel. This twist of surprise sets the stage for an enthralling whirlwind of suspicion and intrigue.

The Confusion Cults As well as Sharks

The plot is tense as authorities pin the blame on poor Gary on the day Susan was murdered, even though he has no motive. Additionally, a cult for sharks has emerged as a fascinating subplot, and introduces us this world where cornfields, and celebrations of sharks converge. And just when you think the world isn't getting any wilder then two inept burglars set out to take away a young shark from the community. It's an unsettling mix of the absurd and hilarious that keep one on edge.

Critiques as well as Comic Relief

While "Sharks of the Corn" is a truly unique and unorthodox experience, (blog post) it's not without its faults. The movie often switches between several characters and scenes making some viewers feel lost and trying to figure out all the different plotlines. It's a deliberate stylistic choice that enhances the spoof and satirical nature of this film although it's not all people's cup of coffee.

The production values of the film are intentionally poor, and the acting is in the realm of questionable. Yet, among the ocean of bad performances Steve Guynn shines through with the laudable character he portrays, embodying his character instead of acting out scripts. It's a rarity of genuine acting among a sea full of cliched performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" enjoys the low-budget style of film with basic effects, but they have an appealing appeal. Most of the shark attacks can be hilariously shown using hand puppets. This adds a touch of absurdity to the movie. The bonkers plotline, revolving about a plan of a shark's cult to resurrect the shark goddess that is where the story fully unleashes its artistic flair. In reality, though, this inventiveness often isn't translated into an exciting watch.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

A major area in which "Sharks of the Corn" falls short is its cinematography. The cinematography and frame work come seem a bit amateurish, and do not have quality and refinement that's typically seen typical of mainstream horror films. While this is likely in keeping the look of low-budget films but it can affect the overall quality of the viewing experience.

In the end "Sharks of the Corn" will be a treat for anyone who hasn't had (click articles) it before. It's an uninteresting and slow series of episodes that may become difficult to discern the significance of. The film's low production values along with the lack of clarity in plot lines, as well as problematic acting will turn off anyone looking for more smooth horror/comedy. But for those looking to watch negative films as entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" can't provide what they expected in terms of hilarity.

Final Rating A single "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five

A poor quality video, sound, acting, and edits "Sharks of the Corn" fails to hit the benchmark. However, despite the possibility of a entertaining spoof of a film, it ultimately fails to deliver an immersive and satisfying story. For me, as the film's reviewer finish with an amusing note that movies, just like corn, will only become better because you have added explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't quite make the cut.

Report this wiki page